Posts Tagged ‘Dracula’

Sometimes a Monster is just a Monster.

Thursday, November 8th, 2007

So I finally finished Frankenstein.  Trying to argue that it’s any better or worse then Dracula is not something that’ll be very rewarding.  Once again you have that crazy Victorian language which grates on me.  And everything is told in the first person in the form of a letter, tho thankfully not nearly as dedicated to the format.

But I am glad I read it.  (I think.)  Now I’ll just have to check out the movies to see how much they changed.  I know that the “classic” movie monster version is already totally wrong.  Frank was quite articulate with his speech.  Not the “Fire, Bad!” we’ve all come to expect.

The book I’ve gotten out of the library has a bunch of essays included as well and I’ve just started reading them.  I’m only about half way through the first one and so far it’s fine example of how to read too much into something.  Apparently Frankenstein, the novel, mostly deals with men’s fear of women’s sexuality.

What?

I hope they get better.  But I am reminded of something I heard in school (Junior High?  High School?).  We were reading “Shane“, the cowboy novel, and going on and on about all the different themes and symbolism and whatnot.  What I had heard, at some point – I can’t remember, is that the author never actually put the stuff our teachers kept testing us on.  He just wanted to write a cowboy novel.

I’ve never really trusted English teachers (and by extension anyone who would write critical essays about someone else’s writing…) when they start pretending how smart they are.

Maybe Frank is just suppose to be scary.

Francis Fraud Coppola

Sunday, October 21st, 2007

So after my fascination with Dracula, I’ve watched both Bela Lugosi‘s 1931 Dracula and Francis Ford Coppola‘s 1992 Bram Stoker’s Dracula.

There’s a reason I italicized part of that.

Both movies take huge liberties with the plot in the novel.  But it’s Coppola’s version which upsets me.  Because the title is a lie.

To call it Bram Stoker’s Dracula gives the impression that they’re using the original story.

But no, that’s not the case.  Mina falls in love with the Count, because she’s his reincarnated wife.  She marries Johnathan anyway, asks to be made into a vampire, helps them track Dracula back to Transylvania, then prevents them from killing him.

I know.  Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot.

That’s exactly like the book.  Or not.

I’m currently reading Frankenstein and intend to watch the various movies for that too.  I can’t wait to see what they did with Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.

Dracula lacks bite.

Sunday, October 14th, 2007

So I finally finished reading Dracula a day or two ago. And I was SO disappointed. I’m thinking it might have been the language used. Victorian English is as strange and difficult to me as Shakespeare‘s iambic pentameter.

It could also have been that I am so accustomed to the idea of Dracula that I find it hard to relate to characters who have no knowledge of him. Almost the first third of the book (after Johnathan’s adventure in Castle Dracula) or more is devoted to the mysterious withering away of Lucy. That’s around 200 pages!

Dracula? Dragula.

And the reason it drags on is what kills me. Van Helsing keeps everything to himself. So much is wasted because he doesn’t tell anyone what’s going on.

Dracula, as a novel, seems to be some sort of moral lesson about the Hacker Ethic. Dracula, as a character, is able to succeed – indirectly – from a lack of knowledge and information. If they only knew what they were up against, they might have taken more direct action sooner. In fact, it’s not until they start sharing their information do they even begin to have some sort of response to the threat.

What I find particularly telling is that when they decide for “Madam Mina‘s” own good that they stop including her in what’s going on that they start having problems again.

And most telling is the contribution provided by Mina. It is Mina that does most of the work that allows them figure out what’s really going on. For this she gets praised for having a “Man-Brain”. ‘Cause really, no mere woman would be able to do it.

Ok, let’s look at the points of the Hacker Ethic:

  • Access to computers – and anything which might teach you something about the way the world works – should be unlimited and total. Always yield to the Hands-on Imperative!
    • Let’s trade computers for Technology and the Wikipedia entry covers that.
  • All information should be free.
    • Until their information was free between them, they had no hope.
  • Mistrust authority – promote decentralization.
    • Van Helsing couldn’t accomplish much when it was just him who knew what was going on.
  • Hackers should be judged by their hacking, not bogus criteria such as degrees, age, race, or position.
    • Add gender to that and Mina Harker is a hacker.
  • You can create art and beauty on a computer.
    • Ok, so maybe this one doesn’t apply.
  • Computers can change your life for the better
    • If we change to technology again I think killing off one of the supreme evils on earth is change for the better.

I think that works rather nicely.

I also think that the novel picks up in it’s last quarter or fifth. But I do find that Dracula’s death lacks a little drama. They catch up on him a cart that’s bringing him back to his castle and just before the sun sets they toss the crate to the snow, pry the lid off of it and kill him. Bram doesn’t really up the tension with it too much. Perhaps Hollywood has me expecting more.

Speaking of Hollywood, I’m going to try and get the famous Dracula movies out of the library and see how they fare to the original story.

—————-
Listening to: Rob Zombie – Dragula

I Vant to Suck your Blood!

Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007

Today is Oct. 1st and I’m already in the mood for Halloween.

I started reading Bram Stoker‘s Dracula. I’ve never read the story before and I’ve only seen the movie once. It’s odd, everyone knows of Dracula, but I bet there are very few who actually know the story.

What child doesn’t know of vampires and their King? He is one of the monsters of our youth. Along with the Wolfman and Frankenstein, they form some sort of unholy trinity.

But Mary Shelley‘s novella was named not for the monster, but for the Doctor that created him. But we still call it Frankenstein.

We get most of what we know from a variety of sources: our parents, movies, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Scooby-Doo. They all make mention of Dracula, but how much of it is the true story?

I’m not the fastest of readers, I hope I can finish it by All Hallow’s Eve.